First Eleven
Home About Us Contact Us
 
Education Gap Year Lifestyle Health Money Travel & Leisure Sport Motoring
   
Issue 6 is Out Now

The Summer 2009 issue reports on why today’s kids grow up faster – and how to handle it, ‘My summer with Obama’, a gap year on the campaign trail, hints on how to find work in a recession, asks is the fashion world a suitable place for school kids to make money, and much more.

Click here to subscribe to First Eleven.

ALL THAT GLITTERS
 

Are Oxford and Cambridge still the glittering prizes for students?
Victoria Neumark reports.

Autumn, and university entrance is on everybody's mind. Should you take a shot and go for Oxford or Cambridge? With Gordon Brown the first prime minister not to have attended Oxbridge since 1945, have the rose-tinted glasses fallen from the eyes of today's school-leavers?

Certainly the “ivory towers” no longer gleam so brightly for a small but significant stream of individualists heading the other way, be it to US universities, business opportunities or a decided preference for vibrant nightlife, “a life you can call your own ” and “getting away from all those public schoolies you've been with”.

You can catch up with some of these rebels on social networking site Facebook. There you will find the We Hate Oxbridge Society, the “I never wanted to go to Oxbridge anyway” group (21 members), the Oxbridge Rejects are Cooly-Cool group and the “I got rejected from Oxbridge 2007 but who cares it's their loss anyway” group.

Who cares indeed? Looking at admission numbers, Oxford alone gets almost 14,000 applications each year, all from straight-A students, for 3,500 places - so a few less hardly matters. Currently independent-school applicants dominate the ancient universities, but they are under government pressure to increase their state-school intake. This means, says Martin Stephen of St Paul's, “We are in danger of giving a place at a top university as a compensation for disadvantage, when it should be a reward for achievement.”

At the moment, that is not happening and top schools such as Eton, Wycombe Abbey, St Paul's, St Mary's Ascot, Winchester, Westminster and North London Collegiate and the Royal Grammar School, Guildford, have doubled numbers going to the oldest universities in the last five years. Their staff can afford to agree with Tony Little, Master of Eton, that “while there are always (and always have been) examples of strange decisions, boys (and the school) see the admissions process as challenging but fair.”

Others feel less certain. The internet is abuzz with resentment from rejected candidates and their families, as numbers going to Oxbridge from such respected schools as Manchester High, Nottingham High and Radley decline. Says Pip Marshall of Nottingham, “My own stepdaughter would, on first analysis, be heavily discriminated against as she is female, has graduate parents and attends a private school. What this doesn't state is that her parents are separated, have retrained several times to keep in average jobs and she has gone to private school on a scholarship with herself and the rest of us making sacrifices. But are these the type of middle-class, stereotypical values we all now love to hate?”

Geoff Lucas, secretary general of the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference (HMC) is confident that “Oxbridge will maintain absolute standards” - perhaps a coded message that there is not much to worry about for private-school parents. As he added wryly, “The more they develop additional tests on ability and achievement for individual subjects, the more that will favour the kind of parents who want the best for their children - who are often the ones who send their children to an independent school.”

A note of caution here from Anthony Seldon, Master of Wellington College, that it “is the children who are going to university, not the parent. The job of a good parent is to help the child identify and achieve what they themselves want.” The “I went to Oxbridge so my children should do, too,” mentality doesn't necessarily work.

For Oxford and Cambridge do not appeal to all. Some of the courses seem antiquated, as do dress codes and quaint rituals. The cities, if beautiful, are small and sleepy compared to the buzzy night-life of Manchester, Leeds or Birmingham. The high workload (one or two essays a week) and intensive contact with academic staff which attract some students repel others. Are these venerable seats of learning now “uncool”?

Nicholas Shrimpton, deputy principal of Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford reflects. “We still get lots of clever independent school applicants, and they seem 'cool' to me both at interview and once they are here. But I suspect that some (especially boys) who might have applied in the past are put off by the current exam treadmill of GCSE, AS and A2 in successive years, and the feeling that you have to have a 'perfect' record at the first two of these (lots of A*s at GCSE, 3 As at AS) to stand a chance. In this sense the Oxbridge applicants might seem geeky - they apparently need to have been impeccably well-behaved and hard-working between the ages of 15 and 18.”

Like many, he sees new forms of testing as positive for both colleges and also candidates. “The return of Oxford entrance exams, or rather 'aptitude tests', in History and English this year, may help the eccentric, or naughty, or rebellious, or late-developing candidate get another chance. I welcome this because I'd like a few more indvidualists, rather than slaves of the system.”

That said, Cambridge University recently published a list of 20 A-levels which are “a less effective preparation for our courses.” Don't take more than one of these if you want to go to Cambridge. They include sports science, media or theatre studies, accounting, business studies, design and technology A levels.

Oxbridge college interviews loom in December. The interview process has been described as “notoriously eccentric,” including questions like: “Here is a piece of bark, please talk about it” (biological sciences, Oxford); “Put a monetary value on this teapot” (PPE, Cambridge); and “At what point is a person 'dead'?” (medicine, Cambridge).

Mike Nicholson, director of undergraduate admissions at Oxford advises applicants that they “need to know their subject and be clear as to their motivation and interest. They should have enough understanding of relevant material and be able to talk confidently for 10 minutes each on two or three different aspects, and they should certainly keep a copy of, and re-read, any work that they submit. Don't panic, don't feel that you have to know everything about your subject, and don't feel you need a dozen new interview outfits to be successful. Just relax, and be yourself.”

Adds Nicholas Shrimpton: “Be keen.”

 
Back to Contents